MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2352618212

Snow Depths Simulated by BATS-SAST Model and Its Improvement

2009· article· en· W2352618212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weiping Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Glaciology and Geocryology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowInterceptionEnvironmental scienceCanopy interceptionCanopyPrecipitationDeposition (geology)Snow removalAtmospheric sciencesHydrology (agriculture)MeteorologyGeologyGeographyEcologyGeomorphology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A BATS-SAST model was employed to simulate the snow deposition processes in the four snow deposition cases in Canada,i.e.,Sk_OJP 2001/02,2002/03,2003/04 and Sk_HarvestJP 2003/04. At Sk_OJP site the long wave radiation scheme and precipitation scheme were modified. Considering different interceptions between rain and snowfall and effect of wind and canopy temperature on snow download,the canopy interception model was improved. At Sk_HarvestJP site the snow cover fraction scheme was modified. Results show that the model is able to simulate the basic processes of snow cover reasonably. The modified model,which considers the part of the transmitted through the canopy in computing long wave radiation and precipitation at Sk_OJP site,can make the simulation of snow depth more and closer to the observation. The improved canopy interception model,which influences the variation of snow depth under canopy by changing canopy interception,has a great improvement on simulation of snow depth,especially on the ablation period of snow cover. At Sk_HarvestJP site,the snow depth was lessened simulated by the improved model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Glaciology and GeocryologySame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207