Intersections in Cultural Policy: Geographic, Socioeconomic and Other Markers of Identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT/RESUME Region is shown to be constitutive of individual and identifications, not only as geographically determined by one's province, territory, or area of residence, but also as a cultural symbol. It highlights the politics and instability that lurk beneath the anodyne concept of identity. Intersectionality is performative. Using approaches developed in cultural geography and environmental psychology, is shown to be significant in the expression and everyday realisation of formations. Region challenges the assumption that intersect on a single plane or that do not appear in different forms depending on their engagement with other, equally varying markers. In regional, urban, and neighbourhood examples, is shown to intersect with and to impact on other such as race, gender, and ethnicity in four ways: (1) as a surrogate for other such as socio-economic status or ethnicity; (2) as a framework for analysis of specific cultural policy and issues; (3) as a resource or set of affordances in the everyday performance and blending of intersectional identifications, and (4) as part of a social spatialisation or a uniting local groupings of diverse identities. Although under-researched as an intersectional and surrogate marker, is relevant to cultural policy as a brand reflected in diverse cultural events. It has the power to unite people despite other, mutually-incompatible markers. L'auteur demontre que la est composee de personnes et d'identites sociales, non seulement etablies par la geographie d'une province, d'un territoire ou d'un lieu de residence, mais egalement en tant que symbole culturel. Le document met en lumiere les politiques et l'instabilite sous-jacentes au concept anodin de l'identite. L'identite intersectionnelle est performative. A l'aide d'approches decoulant de la geographie culturelle et de la psychologie environnementale, l'auteur demontre que la est tres importante dans l'expression de la realisation quotidienne des formations de l'identite. La met en question la supposition que les marqueurs de l'identite s'entrecroisent sur un seul plan ou que les marqueurs de l'identite n'apparaissent pas sous differentes formes selon leur engagement envers d'autres marqueurs de l'identite qui varient tout autant. Au moyen d'exemples a l'echelle regionale, urbaine et communautaire, l'auteur demontre que la s'entrecroise avec d'autres marqueurs de l'identite et a une incidence sur ceux-ci, notamment la race, le sexe et l'ethnicite, de quatre facons : 1. comme un substitut pour d'autres marqueurs comme le statut socio-economique ou l'ethnicite; 2. en tant que cadre pour l'analyse de politiques culturelles precises et d'enjeux lies a l'identite; 3. en tant que ressource ou ensemble d' > dans le rendement quotidien et le melange des identites intersectionnelles, enfin, 4. faisant partie d'une > ou d'une > unissant les regroupements locaux de diverses identites. Bien qu'elle soit sous-recherchee en tant que marqueur de l'identite intersectionnel et de substitution, la est pertinente a la politique sociale en tant que marque refletee dans differents evenements culturels. Elle a le pouvoir d'unir les gens en depit d'autres marqueurs de l'identite incompatibles. INTRODUCTION This brief theoretical paper (1) considers the relevance of intersecting region[al], socioeconomic status, and other identity markers for cultural policy and research. It argues for a flexible framework for regional-intersectional research on cultural identities because region is round to contribute to intersectional identities in multiple ways. It attempts to clarify the manner in which as a spatial marker is not only a regional myth or stereotype, but may act as a resource for individuals and communities, a powerful label which frames policy decisions, a surrogate for other non-spatial of and intersections such as socioeconomic status, religion, and ethnicity. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".