MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2353107682

Molecular Cloning and Analysis of the N4 Neuraminidase Subtype from an Avian Influenza Virus

2004· article· en· W2353107682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hualan Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Veterinary · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuraminidaseHemagglutinin (influenza)VirologyGenBankInfluenza A virus subtype H5N1AntigenicityBiologyGeneVirusCloning (programming)Open reading frameSequence analysisAmino acidH5N1 genetic structurePeptide sequenceGeneticsAntibodyMedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avian influenza viruses(AIV) are divided into different subtypes based on the antigenicity of the surface protein hemagglutinin(HA) and Neuraminidase(NA),and 15 HA subtypes and 9 NA subtypes have been isolated from birds.The influenza viruses with N1(H1N1,H5N1) or N2(H2N2,H3N2,H5N2 and H9N2) are widely circulated in birds,pigs and humans,and influenza viruses with N6(H4N6) and N8(H3N8) are circulated in pigs and horses,respectively,however,the influenza viruses with other NA subtypes are only seldom isolated from wild birds,and the sequence information of these NAs are very limited in the GenBank.In this study,the NA gene of N4 subtype influenza virus A/Turkey/Ontario/6118/68(H8N4) was amplified,cloned and sequenced.Results showed that the N4 NA gene has one open reading frame and encodes 470 amino acids.Deduced amino acids sequence showed that there are 9 potential glycosylation sites and 20 cysteines in the N4 NA protein.The sequence in this study is the first report of the full length N4 NA gene,and it will provide the necessary information for the further analysis of the structure and function of N4 NA of AIV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of Veterinary→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→