MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353334158

Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield

2003· article· en· W2353334158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVerticillium wiltVerticilliumFusarium wiltWilt diseaseBiologyPlant disease resistanceGossypiumYield (engineering)AgronomyFusarium oxysporumFusariumHorticultureGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fifty new lines or verieties in Gossypium hirsutum L from Yangtze River drainage area were used to test the resistance to Fusarium or Verticillium wilts Ten of the lines were selected to analyze the seed cotton yield lost per plant that was caused by different grade diseases The results showed that (1) Four lines (10 0% of 40 lines) were resistant to Fusarium wilt, 27 tolerant (67 5%), 9 susceptible (22 5%) (2) One line (3 3% of 30 lines) was resistant to Verticillium wilt, 26 tolerant (86 7%), 3 susceptible (10 0%) (3) The diseases were scored by Ⅰ-Ⅳ grade, and the disease Ⅰ of Fusarium wilt caused yield reduction in seed by 32 0%, diseaseⅡ by 52 9%;disease Ⅲ by 68 7%; disease Ⅳ by 83 4% (4) The disease Ⅰ of Verticillium wilt yield lost by 30 3%, diseaseⅡ by 51 9%, disease Ⅲ by 68 4%, disease Ⅳ by 86 7%

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgricultural Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207