MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2353963868

Radioactive decay of the nuclides in the process of the gravitational constant decrease

2009· article· en· W2353963868 on OpenAlexaff
Lixin Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueYunnan Daxue xuebao. Shehui kexue ban · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsTellabs (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclideGravitational constantPhysicsRadioactive decayGravitationDecay energyGravitational energyMantle (geology)Constant (computer programming)NucleosynthesisNuclear physicsNuclear reactionGeophysicsClassical mechanicsDecay schemeGamma ray
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is the pressing problem to solve that the dynamic mechanism of the Earth's plate movement,earthquakes and volcanic activity,the formation of rocks and the earth layer,as well as the Earth's resources and energy.On the basis of the role of the gravitational constant change for nuclide,and the principles of nuclear physics,the dynamic model of nuclear force has been established,the model is closely related and synchronization with the process of the universe evolution.This model has made reasonable explanation for above various problems.according to demomstrion for the Earth's structure energy release,with the decreases of gravitational constant,It is proved that the radioactive decay of nuclides is the release of the Earth's structure energy.Demonstration and quantitative calculation for the chemical binding energy of the mantle rock,and it is a absorption of nuclear decay energy.That the gravitational constant reduce has been proved has the role of internal consistency for universal macro and nuclei micro,and the role for the macro and the micro is uniformity.The conclusions Obtained for the stability or non-stability of the structure of nuclei is relative.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYunnan Daxue xuebao. Shehui kexue banSame topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207