MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2354041896

Analysis on Climatic Disaster in Winter in Middle and High Latitude Regions of Northern Hemisphere

2012· article· en· W2354041896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shuyun Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueGaoyuan qixiang · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWinter stormClimatologyRossby waveSnowJet streamSubtropical ridgeBlocking (statistics)Polar vortexEnvironmental scienceNorthern HemisphereAtmospheric sciencesMeteorologyGeologyPrecipitationGeographyJet (fluid)Troposphere
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large-scale disastrous frozen weather caused by heavy rain and snow in the winter from 2007 to 2008 was diagnosed and analyzed.The relationship between the blocking high and the disastrous weather was mainly discussed.According to the influence of the transmission and development of Rossby wave on the blocking high,the appearing reason of the blocking high and its function in the weather process were analyzed.The results indicate that a little current of cold air go down south common action of Ural and Okhotsk Sea blocking highs,and cause a widespread drop of temperature and lasting snow when the southern cold air meet with warm airflow from Subtropical High in the Western Pacific.Blocking high collapseswith the transportation of cold air stream,a new blocking high locatesto the west of blocking high with the transportation of warm advection.Moreover,the blocking high in North America leads to the snowstorm in most region of America and eastern part of Canada in the end of 2007 as well.The propagation and evolution of Rossby wave promote the formation of blocking high,and polar vortex also causessnow and blizzard in these areas.The restructure of the blocking high(collapses and reconstruct) leads to the onset of strong cold air.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaoyuan qixiangSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207