Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using the Pinus contorta seeds of nine provenances from Canada,planting experiment of Pinus contorta was conducted at Shiziping and Yaojiapo in Gaoyanzi forest farm of Jianshi county,Hubei province.The growth performance of sapling stage showed that Pinus contorta could adjusted to the site conditions of the two experimental sites.The survival ratio and preserving ratio reached 91.3 %~100 %.The height growth and DBH growth of 14 years old experimental forests were analyzed,the results showed that the height growth and DBH growth of Pinus contorta were very significantly affected by provenance and planting site,and there was very significant interaction between provenance,planting site and tree height growth.Among the 9 provenances,the tree height growth of 10577,26230,25730,27084,28476,14726,26153 was very significantly higher than that of 25801 and 25803.There was no significant difference between every two provenance of the seven provenances.At Yaojiapo experimental site,the tree height growth of 10577 was very significantly higher than other provenances,next in order of 28476,26153,25730,27084 and 14726.The difference of DBH growth among provenances was rooted in the difference between 10577,25803 and 25801,and the difference between every other two provenances was not significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".