Children's Somatization Symptoms and Its Relation with Alexithymia and Psychological Meltreatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the prevalence of children's somatization symptoms and the relationship with alexithymia、psychological meltreatment and neglect,and to build relation model of this four.Methods: 940 primary school students were assessed with a series of questionnaires including Children's Somatization symptoms Inventory Scale(CSI)、the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20) and Child Psychological Maltreatment and Neglect Scale.Results: ①The average score of children's somatization symptoms inventory is 7.40(M=7.40,SD=7.07),27.3% of the children reported at least one serious somatization symptoms,There are significant differences in somatization symptoms from different gender and different grades;②The correlation coefficients of the TAS-20 and CSI is 0.32(P0.01);③The direct effect of alexithymia to children's somatization symptoms is 0.39,and the indirect effect of child psychological meltreatment and neglect to somatization symptoms are 0.09 and 0.13.Conclusion: ①The detection rate of children's somatization symptoms in this sample is 27.3%,the pain/weak symptoms is the most common symptoms;②There is low to moderate correlation between alexithymia and children somatization symptoms;③Alexithymia mediates the relationship between somatization symptoms and psychological meltreatment and neglect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".