Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to clone sequence of the coding region of the goat c-Myc gene,this study designed specific primers by refering to c-Myc genes coding sequence reported in GenBank including sheep,cattle,pigs,horses,etc.,and then amplified c-Myc coding sequence from embryonic skin tissue of goats by using RT-PCR technique and had sequence analysis.The result indicated that CDS of goat c-Myc gene had 1320bp length including the stop codon.For only 10differences comparing to sheep c-Myc gene nucleotide sequence(GenBank accession number:Z68501.1),homology reached 99.17% and homology of deduced amino acid sequence reached 99.09%.Analysis of homology with other species showed that homology of goat c-Myc gene coding region nucleotide sequence was 91.2%,92.0%,90.2%,86.9%,86.0% with pigs,wolves,humans,rats,mice,and homology of deduced amino acid sequence was 93.6%,96.1%,92.3%,91.1%,89.6%.Using bioinformatics software analysis showed that goat c-Myc protein was localized in the nucleus and contained a HLH domain.This study further researched the function of c-Myc gene and laid the foundation of investigating the effect in the process of goat somatic cell reprogramming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".