Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the preventive effects of dezocine on emergence agitation from total intravenous anesthesia in children undergoing post-adenotonsillectomy. Methods Sixty children,ASA Ⅰ or Ⅱ,aged 3-7 y,were equally randomized into 2 groups: dezocine group( group D) and normal saline group( group C). Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 μg / kg,propofol 2. 0 mg / kg and cisatracurium 0. 15 mg / kg followed by endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Anesthesia was maintained with propofol 9-15 μg·kg- 1·min- 1and remifentanil 0. 05-0. 20 μg·kg- 1·min- 1through infusion pump. Dezocine 0. 1 mg / kg or saline in equal volume was intravenously injected groups D and C,respectively,15 min before the end of surgery. The operation time,extubation time,modified Aldrete score immediately after admitted to postanesthesia care unit( PACU) and residence time at PACU were recorded. Pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium( PAED) and modified children's hospital of eastern ontario pain scale( mCHEOPS) were recorded every 10 min in the first 30 min in of PACU,and the adverse reaction within 6 h after surgery was recorded. Results Compared with group C,PAED scores at immediately,10 min and mCHEOPS scores at every time point after admitted to PACU were decreased in group D( P 0. 05). There was no significant difference in extubation time,modified Aldrete score immediately after admitted to PACU and residence time at PACU between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the adverse reaction within 6 h after surgery between the two groups. Conclusion Dezocine 0. 1 mg / kg given intravenously 15 min before the end of surgery is effective on the prevention of emergence agitation without delayed recovery and extubation time and increased adverse reaction in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".