MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355575076

Screen of Polyembryonic Mutant Rice Induced by Ion Beam Implantation and Initiation of Its Additional Embryo

2007· article· en· W2355575076 on OpenAlexaff
Dai Xi-mei

Bibliographic record

VenueYuanzihe wuli pinglun · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeedlingPolyembryonyEmbryoRadicleGametophyteBiologyEndospermApomixisMutantBotanyPloidyGeneticsGene
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, the autotetraploid rice IR36-4X was treated with ion implantation technique by nitrogen ion beams and a polyembryonic seedling mutant(named as the IR36-Shuang) was identified in M2 generation. The mutant line was systematically investigated about the location of seedling in polyembryonic seedling, and the cytological initiation of the additional embryo in the IR36-Shuang was observed and determined. The results are as follows: The location of seedling in the polyembryonic rice IR36-Shuang could be differentiated into 2 types: the uncomplete twin seedlings and the complete twin seedlings. There were 2 types in the uncomplete twin seedlings, i.e. the twin seedlings with single plumule axis and single radicle and the twin seedlings with single radicle and twin plumule axis. The complete twin seedlings also included 2 types, i.e. the normal twin seedlings and the abnormal twin seedlings. The double-embryo was observed during different embryo development stage of the IR36-Shuang. The additional embryo in the IR36-Shuang might arise from the double set of embryo sacs in single ovary, multi-egg-cell egg apparatus, antipodal cells or endosperm cells. The results revealed the practicability of ion beam implantation technique in creating new polyploidy idioplasm, which could provide a new approach for searching the material with apomixis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueYuanzihe wuli pinglunSame topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207