Treatment of coronary heart disease and angina pectoris with Tongxinluojiaonang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the curative effect of Tongxinluojiaonang in treating coronary heart disease and angina pectors.Methods Two hundred and sixty-eight patients with clinically diagnosed coronary heart disease and angina pectoris were divided into two groups randomly: the treatment group and the control group, with 134 cases in each group.The control group were treated with common pharmaceuticals, while on the basis of abore treatment the treatment group were treated with Tongxinluojiaonang, taking orally 4 capsules each time, three times a day.The course of treatment was four weeks.In the overall process, all cases were monitored by electrocardiogram,dynamic electrocardiogram and blood biochemistry. According to the variation of patient’s condition, some cases were monitored by immediate electrocardiogram,cardiac ultrasonography and treadmill exercise testing.The relating symptoms,heart attacks and glyceryl trinitrate using levels were recorded.Results The total effective rate of treatment group was 91.79%, and that of the control group 70.15%.The diversity between them was significant(P0.01).Conclusion Tongxinluojiaonang can effectively relieve symptom of stethalgia,sense of suppression in the chest,palpitation and shortness of breath. It can remarkably improve myocardial ischemia, and is an ideal pharmaceutical in treating coronary heart disease and angina pectoris.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".