MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2355782797

Research on open economic development of Jilin Province oriented regional cooperation in Northeast Asia

2015· article· en· W2355782797 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Northeast Normal University · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWOT analysisFrontierStrengths and weaknessesUrbanizationExclusive economic zoneBusinessChinaGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthGeographyEnvironmental planningRegional scienceEconomyPolitical scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Based on the SWOT analysis method,this article studys the strengths,weaknesses,opportunities and threats of the open economic development in Jilin Province,and puts forward the corresponding path and countermeasures.Conclusions are drawn as follows:the frontier offshore geographical location,rich industrial type and the open policy introduced gradually are strengths in Jilin Province open economic development,the open overall level is not high and the low level of modern logistics are weaknesses,new urbanization and government support are opportunities,and the complex international environment and competitive domestic environment are threats.In view of this,should enhance the level of opening up and development of Chang-Ji-Tu,and achieve open side sea as the core,open up the eastern border city,and promote the overall economic cooperation with North Korea as the key point,and expand two mountainsrailway,and get through the second Northeast Asia-Europe land bridge as the purpose,and put forward countermeasures of open economic development in Jilin Province.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it