MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2356114451

Turbidite-hosted Gold Deposits in SE Guizhou Province, China: Their Regional Setting, Structural Control and Gold Mineralization

2005· article· en· W2356114451 on OpenAlexaff
Huanzhang Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Geological Sinica · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTurbiditeGeochemistryShear zoneGrabenQuartzProterozoicFold (higher-order function)Mineralization (soil science)GeomorphologyMetallogenyStructural basinSedimentary rockSeismologyPaleontologyPyriteTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Jinping—Tianzhu—Liping area in SE Guizhou province, China, is a turbidite-hosted gold province and the primary gold mineralization is well developed in Proterozoic turbidite in fold belts of SE Guizhou. The basic structures of the area are as follows. (1) Two E-W-trending faults: Kaizhai—Gaonian fault in the north and the Kaili—Qimeng fault in the south, which build a regional graben structure. (2) During the Caledonian movement, regional deformation towards the NE direction lead to folded belts and several NE-trending parallel shear zones and their second-order structures. Ore fluids flowed upwards alone the shear zones to form lenticular gold-bearing quartz veins in the shear zones and stratiform gold-bearing quartz-vein deposits in turbidite. In this region more than 20 gold deposits have been discovered, including mainly two types of quartz veins: bedding concordant and discordant veins. Turbidite-hosted gold deposits are of great academic significance since they are discovered for the first time in China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.770

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Geological SinicaSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207