MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2356149784

Robust Reliable Controller Design Which Guarantees Stability of Inner Loop System

2009· article· en· W2356149784 on OpenAlex
Yan Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJisuanji fangzhen · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)ActuatorStability (learning theory)Inner loopLyapunov functionRobust controlOptimization problemTracking (education)Computer scienceControl engineeringControl systemEngineeringControl (management)Algorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The former methods for the robust reliable controller design are more conservative and could not guarantee the stability of the inner one of the augment tracking system.To solve these problems,an algorithm for the controller design was proposed based on multi-objective optimization via parameter dependent Lyapunov functions and an ILMI approach.The helicopter parameter uncertainty and the disturbance of wind were considered during the design process.The multi-objective optimization methodology under the mixed H∞ /LQ constraint was used to ensure that the designed helicopter flight tracking controller guarantees the stability the inner loop system.The augment system attains the optimal tracking performance during normal system operation and maintains an acceptable lower level of tracking performance in the event of actuator faults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it