MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2356687852 · doi:10.3171/2016.3.jns152159

Struthers' ligament and traumatic median nerve injury: case illustration

2016· article· en· W2356687852 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paule Lessard Bonaventure, Hélène T. Khuong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedian nerveBrachial arteryEpicondyleUlnar nerveSurgeryLigamentAnatomyNeurovascular bundleBrachial plexusNerve injuryElbowRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J neurosurg May 13, 2016 1 submitted September 17, 2015. accepted March 11, 2016. include when citing Published online May 13, 2016; DOI: 10.3171/2016.3.JNS152159. correspondence Helene T. Khuong, Department of Neurological Sciences, Division of Neurosurgery, CHU de Quebec–Universite Laval, 1401 18th St., Quebec, QC G1J 1Z4, Canada. email: helene-thida.khuong.1@ulaval.ca. A 31-year-old right-handed man sustained a penetrating injury to the medial aspect of his right arm that resulted in brachial artery laceration. He underwent a brachioradial artery bypass. At the time of surgery, neither the right median nerve nor the ulnar artery was found in its usual location in the vicinity of the brachial artery. The patient was referred 5 months later with a clinical and electrophysiological picture of complete median nerve injury. MRI showed right median nerve discontinuity, with a proximal stump neuroma in the humeral supracondylar area. A linear structure joining a supracondylar spur to the medial epicondyle was identified as Struthers’ ligament, with the median nerve deviating away from the brachial artery (Fig. 1 left). Median nerve reconstruction using autologous sural nerve graft was offered. Intraoperatively, the median nerve was found medial to its normal course and trapped under a rigid band (Fig. 1 right). The Struthers’ ligament was resected to release the median nerve and perform a tension-free graft reconstruction toward the distal stump (Fig. 1 right). This case illustrates that, although rare, the presence of Struthers’ ligament can be associated with significant neurovascular variations.1,2 Originally described in 1848,5 Struthers’ ligament is estimated to be found in 1%–2% of individuals, but its prevalence may vary according to the studied population.3 Struthers’ ligament is well recognized as a cause of median nerve entrapment.4 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of its influence on the management of a traumatic nerve injury.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0120.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicNerve Injury and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207