MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357356815

Epidemic features of TB in Guiling City from 2007-2011

2013· article· en· W2357356815 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhao Ri-xi

Bibliographic record

VenueZhiye yu jiankang · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)Quarter (Canadian coin)MedicineEpidemiologyEpidemic controlEnvironmental healthTuberculosisDemographyMale to femaleGeographyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)Pathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Objective]To understand the TB patients data via TB special reporting system,to analyze the dynamic changes of epidemic reporting and epidemiological characteristics,and provide evidence for the future TB control programs.[Methods]Descriptive analysis was performed on TB patients data reported in TB special reporting system from 2007-2011.[Results]A total of 18 187 TB cases were reported from 2007-2011,with average reported incidence of 71.52 /100 000.The incidence showed annual declining trend,from 87.5 /100 000 in 2007 to 58.96 /100 000 in 2011.Smear positive occupied 43.03%,with upward trend.Male cases were more than female cases,with ratio of 3.09∶ 1.TB cases distributed in every month,the incidence was relatively low in 1st quarter and 4th quarter.The incidence of counties with convenient transportation was higher than that of remote mountain area,with the highest(101.61 /100 000) in Lipu County and the lowest(48.17 /100 000) in Ziyuan County,showing upward tendency in urban area.[Conclusion]Guiling City actively promotes the modern TB control strategy,strengthen DOTS management to reduce the TB incidence.But the TB epidemic is still not optimistic,effective TB prevention and management measures should be adopted to control the spread of TB,aiming at different populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhiye yu jiankangSame topicTuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207