MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2357651257

Change Trends and Causes in Sunshine Duration and Visibility over Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau in Recent 45 Years

2010· article· en· W2357651257 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaobo Zheng, Luo Yu-xiang, Duan Chang-chun, Zhao Tianliang, Juan Chen, Kang Wei-min

Bibliographic record

VenueGaoyuan qixiang · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunshine durationCloud coverVisibilityPlateau (mathematics)Environmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesClimatologyTroposphereDuration (music)MeteorologyCloud computingRelative humidityGeographyGeologyMathematicsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the observed data of sunshine duration,total cloud cover and visibility at 184 stations over the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau (YGP) from 1961\_2005,the long-term trends of sunshine duration,lower-level water vapour in cloud cover,dry visibility (DV) and dry extinction coefficient over the YGP are analyzed.The result shows that when the cloud cover and water vapour content in midand lower-levels over the YGP have no obvious changes,the 85% stations appear the annual sunshine duration decreasing,and their reduced amount is between 12.2 and 173.7 h·(10a)-1.The result of Mann-Kendall test shows that there are 63.7% stations to appear abrupt change in the stations of sunshine duration decreasing.The abrupt changes start from 1970s,and main in 1980s\_1990s.The decreasing trend has been no obvious since the 21 st century.The annual average of DV decreases from 34 km in 1960s to 27 km at present.The analyses of cloud cover,upper-level water vapour and visibility show the increasement of troposphere aerosol and polluter concentration over the YGP is the main reason that lead to sunshine duration reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaoyuan qixiangSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207