Pharmacological researches of Syngnathus acus Linnaeus on mouse benign prostatic hyperplasia model induced by fetal urogenital sinus implants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the effects of Syngnathus acus Linnaeus on mouse benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) induced by fetal urogenital sinus implants,and to investigate the possibility of applying Syngnathus acus Linnaeus to BPH treatment.Methods Mouse BPH model was established by implanting 16 days old embryo urogenital sinus of mouse.After oral administration of Syngnathus acus Linnaeus(50,100,200 mg.kg-1) for 30 days,the indices of seminal vesicle and prostatic weight,serum acid phosphatase(ACP),prostatic gland perimeter,gland area and gland epithelial height of mice were measured.Results Compared to BPH model group,oral administration of Syngnathus acus Linnaeus reduced the prostatic weight,serum ACP,prostatic gland perimeter,gland area and gland epithelial height,and increased the index of seminal vesicle.Conclusion As a traditional drug for invigorating the kidney and strengthening Yang,increasing number of sperms,Syngnathus acus Linnaeus showed therapeutic effects on BPH,hence could be developed a marine drug for treatment of BPH without side effects such as impotence and oligospermatism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".