Effects of inoculation with different Rhizobium leguminosarum strains on growth performances, yield, and grain quality of a semi-leafless pea variety.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to study the effects of inoculation with Rhizobium leguminosarum strains on growth performances,yield,and grain quality of Canadian pea M.P.1824,a pot experiment was conducted involving inoculating with eight different Rhizobium leguminosarum strains.The results showed that,compared with no-inoculated control,rhizobium inoculation could extend pea's growth periods,produce a better growth in pea's ripening period,increase yield,and increase grain crude protein and fiber content,but reduce the content of soluble sugar.When inoculated with rhizobium ACCC 16058,periods of flowering beginning,flowering and podding beginning,podding,pod ripening delayed by 3.1,5.2,4.8,and 12 d,respectively.The number of branches at flowering and podding beginning period and plant height at pod ripening period increased by 45.5% and 16.61% respectively.In addition,pods per plant,grains per plant,grain dry weight per plant,and grain dry weight per pot were significantly(P0.05) increased by 76.67%,85.54%,65.13%,and 36.71%,respectively.Inoculating with commercial rhizobium F98 significantly(P0.05) raised the crude protein content and reduced the soluble sugar content,with variable quantity of +12.37% and-37.77%.Inoculating with CCBAU 43228 and CCBAU 43232 significantly(P0.01) increased the content of crude fiber by 1.24 and 1.20 times compared with CK,and by 39.7% and 37.6% compared with F98.While inoculating with CCBAU 43232 decreased the content of soluble sugar by 35.65%.In conclusion,for pot experiment,the comprehensive performance of M.P.1824 inoculated with rhizobium ACCC 16058 was the best.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it