Numerical Simulation of Temperature Distribution in Skin Tissue Generated by Different Shape Continuum Laser
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rule of heat transfer that is irradiated by plane peak continuum laser and gauss continuum laser are analyzed based on thermal conduction equations of biological tissue. The three layer skin tissue model that is more closely to cell size is built. The transient temperature distribution in skin tissue generated by two different shape lasers is numerical simulated using finite element method. The temperature field of skin tissue in the circumstances different action time and exterior distance and depth is studied respectively. The results show that the highest temperature in the skin tissue generated by plane peak continuum laser is less than gauss continuum laser's on the same conditions. The reason is which energy of plane peak continuum laser is decentralizing and energy of plane peak continuum laser is centralizing. The area and penetrating depth of temperature rise generated by gauss continuum laser is bigger. The cooling time of achieving elementary temperature is longer corresponding when the laser is removed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it