MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358513114

Effects of semichemicals of non-preferable plants on the populations of Thrips palmi

2004· article· en· W2358513114 on OpenAlexaff
Qin Yu-jie, Weijian Wu, Liang Guangwen

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Pest Control Strategies
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzadirachtinAgeratum conyzoidesThripsEucalyptus oilEucalyptusBiologyToxicologyHorticultureInfestationBotanyAgronomyPesticideWeed
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effects of 16 kinds of semichemicals of non-preferable plants on Thrips palmi were studied in the laboratory. The results showed that the oviposition deterrrent indices (ODI) of turpentine and azadirachtin were 94. 12% and 81.48% , respectively, the best effects compared with other extracts. Azadirachtin, eucalyptus oil and trupentine also had stronger feeding deterrent activity than other extracts to the adults of Thrips palmi. The feeding deterrent indices (FDI) to the adults were 81. 25%, 70. 53% and 65. 25%, respectively. The effects of controlling T. palmi by treating azadirachtin, Ageratum conyzoides, eucalyptus oil and the abstract of Alocasia macrorrhica were 82. 22% , 70. 84% , 67.94% and 48.13%, respectively. The natural enemies could be affected by eucalyptus oil, but the other three compounds could not kill the natural enemies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicInsect Pest Control StrategiesFrench-language works237,207