MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2358568741

The coupling evolution analysis of resource-environment-economic system in the poor areas of Gansu

2013· article· en· W2358568741 on OpenAlexaff
Hengji Li, East Lansing

Bibliographic record

VenueGanhanqu ziyuan yu huanjing · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Quality and Pollution
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmony (color)Government (linguistics)Natural resourceIndex (typography)Resource (disambiguation)Path analysis (statistics)Natural resource economicsEnvironmental resource managementBusinessEconomic systemEconomicsEcologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dingxi City located in central Gansu province is the poorest area in China,the contradiction between the economic development and the environment resources is even more serious than others,therefore studies imminently to coupled evolution analysis of this area resources-environment-economy system is urgent and necessary.Using principal component analysis method,human activity index,ecological environment index and government interference index,we built a non-parameter regression model under cultural impact and policy interference condition to study the coupling evolution of resources-environment-economy systems of Dingxi.The results indicate that from 1980 to 2008,the relationship of ecological environment and human activities and government interfere was inverted U-shaped surface.The current social and economic development of Dingxi was at the expense of environmental resources,the urgent need is to change the development path,must optimize the industrial structure,promoting clean production and energy conservation,and strengthen environmental supervision and inspection,so that the whole socio-economic could be in harmony with the natural environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGanhanqu ziyuan yu huanjingSame topicEnvironmental Quality and PollutionFrench-language works237,207