MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2360480588

Performance Study on Microemulsion Lyophilized Powder of Evening Primrose Oil

2014· article· en· W2360480588 on OpenAlexaff
WU Hong-ya

Bibliographic record

VenueXiandai shipin keji · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSurfactants and Colloidal Systems
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCryoprotectantDifferential scanning calorimetryMicroemulsionFreeze-dryingEvening Primrose OilMannitolChromatographyChemistryMaterials scienceFood scienceOrganic chemistryCryopreservationBiochemistryPulmonary surfactant
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To investigate the effects of cryoprotectants on the freeze-drying of evening primrose oil microemulsion and its stability,the distribution of Sudan II in the lyophilized powder was analyzed by differential scanning calorimeter(DSC).The cryoprotectants for the microemulsion were screened in terms of appearance,size and powder disperse ability.The stability of the powder under various conditions of storage time and temperature was investigated with the entrapment efficiency as the observing index.In summary,mannitol was shown to be the best cryoprotectant.The lyophilized powder showed good granular pattern,dispersion speed,and large-sized particles.After storage for six months,the entrapment efficiency was decreased from 90.92% to 82.58±0.66% at 37 ℃;while it only decreased to 89.50% and 88.80% at 4 ℃and 20 ℃,respectively.DSC results showed that Sudan II had no effect on thermal property of the microemulsion lyophilized powder and existed as amorphous pattern.The microemulsion lyophilized powder,prepared using evening primrose oil as the oily phase and mannitol as the lyoprotectant,was stable,with high entrapment efficiency and no significant change after stored for 6 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueXiandai shipin kejiSame topicSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsFrench-language works237,207