Observations on Combined Use of Acupuncture and Medicine in Treating Parkinson Disease with Mild Cognitive Impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture plus Gastrodin in treating Parkinson disease with mild cognitive impairment(PD-MCI).Method Forty patients meeting the diagnostic criteria of PD-MCI were randomly allocated to medication and acupuncture plus medicine groups.The medication group was treated with Gastrodin for eight weeks and the acupuncture plus medicine group,with Gastrodin plus acupuncture.An evaluation was made using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale(UPDRSⅢ) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) in the two groups before and after treatment.The therapeutic effects were evaluated.Result The UPDRSⅢ total score and the MoCA score improved significantly in the two groups after treatment(P0.01).There were statistically significant differences in the MoCA and UPDRSⅢ scores between the two groups(P0.01,P0.05).Conclusion Combined use of acupuncture and medicine is more effective than medication alone in treating PD-MCI.It can also decrease the UPDRSⅢ score significantly and has a certain relieving effect on the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".