Bibliographic record
Abstract
3 Eucalyptus original breeds and 5 Eucalyptus crossbreeds were used as materials to analyze genome polymorphism with ISSR markers.10 primers screened out from 100 primers were used for ISSR-PCR.A total of 155 bands were generated,of which 148 bands were polymorphic bands(the percentage of polymorphic band,PPB=95.5%).The results of ISSR were analyzed by NTSYSpc 2.10e software,and indicated that there actually existed much genetic diversity at molecular level among the Eucalyptus species.Genetic distance(GD) of 8 Eucalyptus materials was 0.419 5 to 1.003 4,while Genetic similarity coefficient(SM) was 0.420 0 to 0.693 3.The clustering dendrogram was constructed by UPGMA method.8 Eucalyptus materials were divided into three major groups.E.dunnii and E.camaldulensi fell into one group.E.grandis×E.urophylla,E.urophylla×E.grandis E.urophylla×E.tereticornis,E.wetarensis and E.pellita constituted the second group.E.torelliana formed the third group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".