Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies the genetic characteristics of four kinds of Medicago sativa which were introuduced from foreign country or other aera in China were conducted to search for suitable varieties to be planted,in North China.The Karyotypes were analyzed in the experiment.In this experiment 4 kinds of Alfalfa Algonquin(Canada),WL-323ML(America),WL-232HQ(America),ZhongMu1(cultivated from Chinese and foreign breeds Husbandry and veteinary Institute of Agriculture Academy of China)were analysed by Pressing metheod.It shows that these 4 breeds have the same chromosome number(2n=32)which belong to macrochromosome and differences on components of karyotypic.The test alos shows that most chromosomes of four different breeds are median centrmere.Most of the karyotypic are symmetric.But Algonquin,WL-232HQ,ZhongMu1 are 2A,the length of neighbours chromosomes vary a little,and have a similar evolution level.WL-323ML is 2C.The lingth variances of any two neighbour chromosome in 4breeds are not apparent.Only more variance occurs between two pairs chromosome 1 and 2,15 and 16 in WL-323ML.The last one displays superior evolution characteristis than the former three breeds.ALgounquin has has no satellite,WL-232HQ has one pair,WL-323Mland ZhongMu1 has two pairs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".