MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2361453895

Cloning and analysis of the core sequence of small subunit ribosomal RNA of Endoreticulatus bombycis

2003· article· en· W2361453895 on OpenAlexaff
Min Pan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant and Fungal Interactions Research
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenBankBiologyRibosomal RNACloning (programming)Helix (gastropod)Accession number (library science)GeneticsProtein secondary structureNucleic acid sequenceGeneMolecular biologyEcologyBiochemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endoreticulatus bombycis is a new pathogenic microspordia isolated from the silkworm larvae. With polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method,we amplified a fragment of the core sequence of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSUrRNA) of Endoreticulatus bombycis. The SSUrRNA fragment was inserted into pMD18-T Vector and then cloned. It had a length of 1 230 nucleotides and a percentage GC content of 51.3%. The accession number in GenBank is gi11181769|AY009115. The secondary structure model of the SSUrRNA of Endoreticulatus bombycis was constructed both on the bases of the sequence alignment and RNAFOLD program of the PC-GENE package. The secondary structure model revealed that Endoreticulatus bombycis lacked many eukaryotic helices, such as helix10, helix 11, helix 18, helix 43 and helix 46,but it has V4 region and has more of prokaryotic character. Analyzed by Blast, Endoreticulatus bombycis, Endoreticulatus schubergi and Pleistophora sp.(Sd-Nu-IW8201) have a high similarity, over 98%. Phylogeny tree of Endoreticulatus and Pleistophora species showed that Endoreticulatus and Pleistophora sp.(Sd-Nu-IW8201) was in a group and the other Pleistophora species were in another group .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPlant and Fungal Interactions ResearchFrench-language works237,207