NEWS COVERAGE OF THE RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENT ON GUOYING(STAR OF CHINA) DIAMOND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper conventional web searching software was used for statistical analysis on the news reports of the research achievement on the Guoying(star of China) diamond and their coverage in mass media in countries and regions like USA,Canada,European Union,Australia,Malaysia,Singapore,and Chinese mainland,Taiwan and Hong Kong,etc.Results of statistical analysis on news coverage indicate that the Chinese scholar was the first to propose and prove that the night-shining jewel in the mouth of Empress Dowager Cixi is the so-called Great Mogul diamond rough,which was renamed Guoying(Star of China) according to international scientific nomenclature convention,while tremendous effort has to be made by the mass media in China proper in making good judgment about the value of the scientific progress,in reporting the progress made in studying historically famous diamonds and in transmitting related scientific knowledge.The Chinese scholar is the first to propose and prove that night-shining jewel must be large diamond in history,which serves to decipher completely the world's long-standing natural,historical and cultural mystery,and the first to propose and prove that the history of development and utilization of diamond in China has surpassed 4500 years among the international academic society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".