Study on HPLC fingerprint of Celosia cristata L. ethanol extract
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
HPLC fingerprint of Celosia cristata L. was established to provide a reliable method for the science appraisal and active control its quality. The chromatographic conditions were as follows: Dikma C18chromatobar column( 250 mm × 4. 6 mm,5 μm),gradient elution with acetonitrile-0. 1% phosphoric acid solution,volume flow rate of 1. 0 mL / min, under the detection wave length of 257 nm,and record time of 90 min. Data was analyzed to compare the similarity of the samples for identifying the main chromatographic peaks furthermore. The chromatographic fingerprint of 10 batches of Celosia cristata L. showed 16 characteristic peaks,with the similarity above 0. 9. The qualities of Celosia cristata L. in different batches were in a good similarity. The method can be applied to quality of Celosia cristata L.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it