445 ESCAPE FROM THE SPINDLE OF DEATH: THE DIAGNOSTIC CHALLENGE OF LEMIERRE SYNDROME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Background</h3> The management of sepsis with no obvious focus in the critical care environment involves the acute stabilization of the patient and the sometimes more vexing task of diagnosis. <h3>Case Description</h3> We present the case of a 16 year-old female, previously well, who presented to her community hospital with a 9-day history of fever and pharyngitis. Her symptoms progressed (despite oral antibiotics) to include malaise, abdominal pain, and eventually shortness of breath, pleurisy, and profound nausea, prompting her to seek medical attention. Upon assessment the patient was hypotensive and tachypneic with mild respiratory distress; she was in gallop rhythm and had a very tender abdomen. Her laboratory investigations revealed a slightly elevated white cell count with left shift, thrombocytopenia (platelet count 59,000), azotemia, elevated bilirubin, and metabolic acidosis. She was transported to our pediatric intensive care unit and electively intubated and ventilated. Despite broad-spectrum antibiotics and inotropic support, the patient9s course was complicated by persistent fever and coagulopathy. Numerous other investigations, including head and abdominal imaging, revealed no focus of infection. Only after the eventual difficult identification of an organism was the diagnosis of “Lemierre Syndrome” made. Discovering that the cultured pathogen (fusobacterium necrophorum) was associated with septic thrombophlebitis, we identified an occlusive thrombus in the patients left internal jugular vein. With time and antibiotic therapy the patient gradually stabilized and improved. <h3>Implications for Practice</h3> When a patient does not improve despite general empiric treatments, it is appropriate to consider rarer entities as the underlying disease, with the benefit of the experience in the literature. Our patient9s course paralleled the descriptions of this rare entity found once the pathogen was identified, guiding our prognosis and management. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Originally described in 1936, Lemierre syndrome is a rare occurrence in the post-antibiotic era, with incidence estimated at 1 in 1 million. A high-index of suspicion (once associated pathogens are cultured) is required to make the diagnosis. Controversies remain regarding the place of anticoagulation in therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".