MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2363159567

Twig size-number trade-off among woody plants in Tiantong region,Zhejiang Province of China

2012· article· en· W2363159567 on OpenAlex
Yang Xiao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Plant Ecology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTwigEvergreenDeciduousAllometryLight intensityBotanyWoody plantBiologyForestryEcologyHorticultureGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims The branch size-number trade-off among woody plants has implications for both the formation of plant architecture and biomass allocation in response to environment stresses.Our objective was to examine how the twig size-number relationship varies among woody plants in subtropical broad-leaved evergreen forests in south-eastern China.Methods The study site is located in Tiantong National Forest Park(29°52' N,121°39' E),Zhejiang Province,in Eastern China.We measured twig length,twig diameter,number of twigs and length and diameter of branches from which the twigs were sampled for 76 woody species in a 1-hm-2 plot.Standardized major axis(SMA) analysis was conducted to examine the quantitative relationship between twig size(cross-sectional area) and the number of twigs at a given twig size(twig intensity).Important findings A significantly negative allometric scaling relationship was found between twig intensity and its cross-sectional area.Under level-Ⅱ light exposure(LE-Ⅱ,40%-80% of the plant under direct light),ever-green species had a much higher twig intensity than deciduous species.However,there was no difference in twig intensity between these two life forms under LE-Ⅰ(40% ehxposure) or LE-Ⅲ(80% exposure).Higher twig intensity was found in evergreen species under LI-Ⅲ than under both LE-Ⅰ and LE-Ⅱ.In contrast,twig intensity of deciduous species was not different among any of the light exposure levels.Shrubs 4 m height had higher twig intensity than sub-trees and trees 4 m at a given twig size.We conclude that the twig size-number trade-off across woody plants in Tiantong was consistent with the Corner's rule(that describes the relationship between twig size and the number of twigs),but might differ among different life forms.Both evergreen species and shrubs are inclined to develop higher twig intensity,which indicates their adaptation to environment stress caused by limitations in light availability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it