Feasibility study of culturally adapted cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis in Pakistan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background It is becoming well established that CBT is both effective and cost efficient in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. However, there is a need to adapt CBT to the cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic context of diverse cultural groups. We aimed to establish the feasibility of culturally adaptive cognitive behavior therapy for treatment of psychosis in a low-income country. Methods This is a rater-blind, randomized, controlled trial of the use of CBT in patients with psychosis from a low-income country. Patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophreniform disorder were assessed using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS), PSYRATS (Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales), and the Insight Scale. Participants were randomized into the intervention group ( n = 18) and TAU group ( n = 18). The intervention group received 12 weekly sessions of culturally adapted CBT for psychosis (CaCBTp). Results There were no significant differences between the two groups at baseline. At three months follow-up, there was a statistically significant improvement in the CaCBTp group on PANSS general Psychopathology subscale, PANSS overall score and Insight scale, as compared to the TAU group. The CaCBTp group had lower scores on PANSS positive, PANSS negative sub-scales, and the two subscales of Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale, but differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion Culturally adapted CBT added to pharmacological treatment as usual was acceptable to patients and was helpful in reduction of severity of psychotic symptoms. Adjunctive culturally adapted CBT should be further investigated in this population. Disclosure of interest The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".