Impacts of family function and coping styles on alexithymia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective:To observe the impacts of family function and coping styles on the alexithymia of patients with gastrointestinal cancer.Methods:A survey was performed in 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancer using totronto alexithymia scale(TAS),medical coping modes questionnaire(MCMQ) and family care index,including five dimensions of partnership,adaptation,growth,affection and resolve(PAGAR).Results:①The confrontation factor was positively correlated with the scoring on TAS-I and II,yet significantly negatively with that on TAS Ⅲ and IV as well as the total scores on TAS.The scoring on the factor of avoidance suggested significant positive correlation with TAS-Ⅲ and IV as total scores on TAS,whereas resignation factor scoring was strikingly in negative relation with TAS-I and II,but positively with TAS-Ⅲ and IV as well as total scores for TAS.②Correlation significance was also seen concerning the TAS scoring with diverse factors and family functioning factors.③Multiple regression analysis revealed that the family function,avoidance and resignation were in entry into the regression equation in turn.Conclusion:The family function and coping styles were evidently bound with each other,suggesting that family function and coping styles are important factors affecting alexithymia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".