“Dihuang Yizhi Formula”for the treatment of vascular cognitive impairment no dementia: report of 36 cases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of Dihuang Yizhi Formulafor the treatment of vascular cognitive impairment no dementia( VCIND). Methods Seventy-two cases were randomized into treatment group and control group,with 36 cases in each group. Both of the groups were treated with basic therapeutic measures. Additionally,treatment group was treated withDihuang Yizhi Formula,and control group were treated with donepezil,with the course of 4 months. The changes of MMSE,MOCA,ADL and TCM symptom scores were evaluated. Results In treatment group,there were significant differences in the scores of MMSE,MOCA,ADL and TCM symptom between before and after treatment( P 0. 05); in control group,there were significant differences in the scores of MMSE,MOCA and ADL in control group( P 0. 05). After treatment,significant differences were found in scores of ADL and TCM symptom between the two groups( P 0. 05). Conclusion Dihuang Yizhi Formulacan improve the cognitive function,response capability and clinical symptoms in patients with VCIND of kidney-essence deficiency and phlegm stagnation types.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".