Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the curative efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in lupus patients with nephrotic syndrome.Methods Eleven cases of biopsy proven active diffuse proliferation lupus nephritis to whom previous oral prednisone and/or intravenous cyclophosphamide treatment had been proven ineffective or who had a refractory course and a bad adverse effect,were enrolled for this trial.Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was given at a dosage of 1 0～ 2 0 g/d for 6～13 mouths and lower dosage of prednisone every day.At the same time 8 controls of biopsy proven active diffuse proliferation lupus nephritis with nephrotic syndrome who received continuous prednisone and/or cyclophosphamide treatment over 6 months served for comparing and observing usinary protein,SLEDAI and renal function.Results The urinary protein count and the University of Toronto SLEDAI in patients with diffuse proliferation lupus nephritis decreased significantly by mycophenolate mofetil therapy [urinary protein count from (3 9±0 7) g/d to (1 4±0 5) g/d,the index of illness severity of lupus from 13 5±3 3 to 3 8±1 0 respectively].Conclusion The treatment of mycophenolate mofetil plus small dose glucocorticoids can effectively inhibit the lupus activity of lupus nephritis patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".