Detrital muscovite geochronology and the Cretaceous tectonics of the inner Scotian Shelf, southeastern Canada <sup>1</sup>This article is one of a series of papers published in this CJES Special Issue on the theme of <i>Mesozoic–Cenozoic geology of the Scotian Basin</i>. <sup>2</sup>Geological Survey of Canada Contribution 20120142.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Geochronology of detrital muscovite from the Lower Cretaceous of the central Scotian Basin has shown predominant supply of Meguma terrane detritus, including muscovite with Alleghanian (mid-Carboniferous to Permian) ages from the inner Scotian Shelf. In this study, 87 detrital muscovite grains from five wells in the eastern Scotian Basin, representing depositional ages from Tithonian to Early Albian, were dated by single-grain 40Ar/39Ar techniques. Previous work shows that the provenance of this sediment was different from wells in the central Scotian Basin. Compared with the central Scotian Basin, the muscovite age populations from the eastern Scotian Basin have more (20% versus 7%) pre-Devonian ages, derived from inboard terranes of the Appalachians. In both the central and eastern Scotian Basin, most old grains are found in the Tithonian and the Aptian–Albian, with fewer in the Valanginian and almost none in the Kimmeridgian and the Hauterivian–Barremian. These data suggest rapid unroofing of the Meguma terrane in the Kimmeridgian and Hauterivian–Barremian and greater supply of sediment from Newfoundland to the eastern Scotian Basin in the Tithonian and Aptian–Albian. Compared with the central Scotian Basin, which has most ages in the range 340–300 Ma, the muscovite age populations from the eastern Scotian Basin have a higher proportion of 420–340 Ma and in particular 300–260 Ma ages. Such late Alleghanian overprinting of argon ages is very rare on land in Nova Scotia, but in the Maritimes Basin, this was the time of uplift and erosion of strata.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".