Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy and Persistent Local Irrigation and Conduction in the Treatment of Intervertebral Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the therapeutic effect of the persistent irrigation and conduction for intervertebral infection. Methods: From 1994. 4 - 2002. 4, 21 patients (15 men, 6 women) of lumbar intervertebral infection were treated, among them 15 received percutaneous persistent local irrigation and conduction. The disc levels involved were at L1-L2 (n=l), L2-L3 (n=2), L3-L4 (n=7), L4-L5 (n=8), andL5-S1 (n=3). Under CT or C- arm X-ray, one tube was put into intervertebral space. Debridement and irrigation were performed. Then two-cavity tube was inserted into intervertebral space. After operation, sline solution with antibiotics was used to irrigate intervertebral space 24 hours a day. When irrigative solution was clear and.culture showed negative, it was time to stop the irrigation and conduction. The McGill pain questionnaire was used to observe the changes of lumbago. Results: All patients who received minimal invasive surgery lumbago were relief after 1-2 days. The irrigation and conduction lasted for 7-50 days. In 6 cases, bacterial growth is obtained from infected intervertebral discs about 40%. The intervertebral space fused at 8 -12 weeks. The scoring will begin to descend 1 or 2 days after operation. Conclusion: Persistent irrigation and conduction could dispel the pathogeny, control the symptom and improve the intervertebral space fusion. It is provided with fewer wounds, less cost, shorter period of treatment and easy acceptance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".