[The first imported measles case associated with genotype D4 measles virus in China].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study reported the first imported measles case associated with genotype D4 measles virus in Shanxi province in China. The clinical specimen of throat swab was inoculated into Vero/SLAM culture to isolate the virus. A RT-PCR (Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) was performed to amplify the 676 nucleotides sequence corresponding to the carboxyl terminus of measles virus nucleoprotein. The phylogenetic tree based on the 450 nucleotide acids of carboxyl terminus of N protein was constructed and the homology similarity was analyzed. The Shanxi isolate MVi/Shanxi. CHN/20. 09/1 was clustered within the same genotype group with WHO genotype D4 reference strain, Montreal. CAN/89, and the homology of nucleotide acid between Shanxi isolate and WHO genotype D4 reference strain was 97.3%. The homology of nucleotide acid and amino acid between Shanxi isolate and 2009 genotype D4 representative strain circulating in USA, Canada, India and Russian were 98.0%-100% and 97.3%-100%, respectively. These results showed that the virus isolated from the imported measles case was genotype D4. This is the first report that the genotype D4 measles virus was imported and isolated in China. It is important to accumulate baseline data of China and help to measure transmission pathways and to clarify epidemiological links.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".