Application of Stroop Color-word Association Test and P300 Test in Recognition Function of the Patients with Asymptomatic Cerebral Infarction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the characteristics of Stroop Color-word Association Test(CWT)and event related potential P300 in patients with asymptomatic cerebral infarction(ACI) and to explore the assessment value of the CWT and P300 test for the recognition function of ACI patients. Methods 60 ACI out-patients and in-patients admitted to neurology department of People′s Hospital of Hainan Province were divided into control group(29 cases) and cognitive impairment(CI) group(31 cases) according to the scores of Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA),with score≥26 as control group and score26 as CI group.The results of CWT and P300 test were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results (1)CWT results:The application time and accurate reading in A and B part of CWT between CI group and control group showed no statistically significant differences(P0.05),but the application time and accurate reading in C part of CWT between the two groups showed statistically significant difference(P0.05).(2) P300 test results:The latency of P300 and amplitude between the two groups showed statistically significant difference((392.7±33.2)ms vs.(320.8±29.2) ms,(4.2±2.1)μV vs.(10.3±3.4)μV,t=6.9,7.2,P0.05). Conclusion Combined CWT and P300 test is conducive to early detection of cognitive impairment of the patients with ACI,so that early treatment can be performed to delay aggravation of symptoms and improve life quality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it