A study of psychosocial factors in functional dyspepsia.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective The preliminary study was to explore the psychosocial factors in functional dyspepsia.Methods 50 patients with FD were assessed by scale for minnesota multiphasic personality inventory(MMPI),hamilton depression scale(HAMD),hamilton anxiety scale(HAMA),life event scale(LES),toronto alexithymia Scale(TAS),social support scale(SS).The control group consisted of 30 normal chinese individuals.The patients were randomly divided into two groups,one being treated with famotidine 20 mg and domperidone 10 mg,two times and three times per day respectively,the other treated with famotidine and domperidone in combination with paroxetine 20 mg daily for 8 weeks.Results Patients with functional dyspepsia had significantly higher scores in scale Hs,D,Hy,Pd,Pt,Sc of MMPI,and in the three mood scales(HAMD,HAMA,TAS)compared with the controls.After treatment,the improvements on HAMA nad HAMD and dyspeptic symptoms were better in patients receiving combination therapy than in patients with the routine therapy.Conclusion Patiens with functional dyspepsia had personality and mood disturbance.The medication of paroxetine combined with the routine therapy for functional dyspepsia may probably be helpful in improving the patients'mood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it