MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2366357342

Synthesis and Flame Retardant Properties of a Novel Cyclotriphosphazene-based Epoxy Resin

2014· article· en· W2366357342 on OpenAlexaff
XU Guang-ru

Bibliographic record

VenueHecheng huaxue · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFlame retardant materials and properties
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFire retardantChemistryLimiting oxygen indexThermal stabilityCharEpoxyThermal decompositionPolymer chemistryCharringHEXAPhosphazeneEpichlorohydrinFormaldehydeNuclear chemistryPyrolysisOrganic chemistryPolymerMedicinal chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hexa-(4-aldehyde-phenoxy)-cyclotriphosphazene(HAPCP) was obtained by nucleophilic substitution reaction of hexachlorocyclotriphosphazene with p-hydroxybenzaldehyde.Hexa-(4-carboxyl-phenoxy)-cyclotriphosphazene(HCPCP) was synthesized by oxidation reaction of HAPCP with KMnO4.A novel phosphorus-containing flame retardant epoxy resin(PN-EP) based on cyclotriphosphazene was successfully synthesized by ring opening and closing reaction of HCPCP with epichlorohydrin using benzyltriethylammonium chloride as the catalyst.The structure and thermal stability were characterized by1H NMR,IR and TGA.PN-EP was cured by diaminodiphenyl methane and the flame retardant properties of the thermoset were investigated through limiting oxygen index(LOI) and vertical burning test(UL-94).The results showed that the initial thermal decomposition temperature of PN-EP was 278 ℃ and the char residue remained 40.5 wt% at 700 ℃ and PN-EP had a high thermal stability and charring forming ability.The cured sample can successfully pass UL-94 V-0 rating with the LOI value of 33%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHecheng huaxueSame topicFlame retardant materials and propertiesFrench-language works237,207