[Coronary endarterectomy and bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with diffused coronary artery disease].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review and summarize the early outcomes and clinical experience of coronary endarterectomy (CE) and bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with diffused coronary artery disease. METHODS: From May 2003 to May 2005, 53 patients with diffused coronary artery disease underwent CE and bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. There were 41 males and 12 females aged from 55 to 79 (mean 64 +/- 7) years old. 72% patients (38/53) were in Canadian Cardiac Society (CCS) angina class III and IV. 49% (26/53) had history of myocardial infarction. Coronary angiogram revealed that 3 cases had double vessels disease and, other 50 cases had triple vessels disease with 9 left main stem disease. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ranged from 0.26 to 0.65 (0.52 +/- 0.17). Seventy endarterectomies were performed in 53 patients totally which included 38 in left anterior descending artery (LAD), 8 in circumflex artery and 24 in right coronary artery. Five cases received on-lay venous patch after CE in LAD and then grafted by internal mammary artery (IMA) on the patch. There were 53 left IMAs, 2 radial arteries, others were great saphenous veins, the mean number of grafts was 3.8 +/- 1.1 with index of completeness of revascularization (ICR) 1.03 +/- 0.07. RESULTS: Intra-operative graft flow-meter was used to check the flow in the grafts before chest closure. There is no death in the group. Sixty-three (90%) out of 70 grafts after CE showed a satisfactory grafts flow intra-operatively. Two patients had peri-operative myocardial infarctions but neither had hemodynamic changes. All patients discharged uneventfully with mean hospital stay 9 days postoperatively. Forty-four patients had 6 to 29 months follow-up with no angina re-occurrence. Six patients had coronary angiogram 3 to 27 months postoperatively with all patent grafts to the CE coronaries. CONCLUSION: CE and bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass is technically feasible and can be performed safely in patients with diffused coronary artery disease with increased completeness of myocardial revascularization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".