Bibliographic record
Abstract
The experiment studied the effects of four kinds of allelochemicals( ferulic acid,benzoic acid,Cinnamic acid and Syringic acid) on seed germination and seedling growth of maize. The concentration of four allelochemicals were used in four degrees: 50 mg /L,100 mg /L,200 mg /L and 500 mg /L. The results showed that the four allelochemicals had significant allelopathic effects on seed germination and seedling growth. The effects were significantly related to the allelochemicals and their concentrations. Four allelochemicals in concentration of 50 mg /L,100 mg /L significantly accelerated seed germination of maize,while the concentration was 200 mg /L and 500 mg /L,the inhibiting effect of allelochemicals appears. The four allelochemicals appeared to improve seedling growth at 50 mg /L,100 mg /L,200 mg /L,for instance,Syringic acid in concentration of 100 mg /L had a significant stimulating effect on fresh weight of the maize for promoting the lateral growth of the radicel. With the concentration of allelochemicals increased to 500 mg /L,four allelochemicals showed obvious inhibition effect of seedling growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".