Studies on Light Colour Eggs of Commercial Strain "Xiafang" of Silkworm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analysis of the relation between maintaining characteristics of a strain and the changed factors is a significant topic in agriculture.We investigated the light colour eggs of silkworm race Xiafang,the result indicates that tannish brown egg in whole batch and mixed with little green eggs within batch are the two main types of light colour eggs.It is caused by the difference of pigment of serous membrane in the eggs.Laminar analysis the pigment of eggs in typical batch of the light colour eggs and dark colour eggs batch showed that eggs of the latter are shortage of deep yellow pigments of the dark colour eggs.The development progress of the larval in the light colour batch is shorter than the dark one,but the body weight and health of the larvals is no obviously difference between them.Cocooning of parent silkworm and cocoon quality of light colour batch is no obviously difference compared with dark colour eggs too.The Amount of Egg Laying of the female moth in light colour batch is more than that of the dark one obviously,but the quality of silkworm eggs,such as fertility rate,rate of good eggs and hatchability of hibernating egg are lower than the latter,meanwhile,The uniform degree of embryonic development of light colour eggs is also lower than that of dark one slightly.Therefore,it is consider that light colour eggs don't influence the rearing performance obversily,but is may be made a certain effect on propagation coefficient.In addition,investigating egg color of silkworm rearing with mulberry leaves daubed bleaching liquid and the control indicated brown egg has no necessary relation with mulberry leaves daubed bleaching liquid.but mulberry leaves daubed bleaching liquid seems to increase egg color discrepancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".