Research and Promotion of the Three Kinds Highly Effective Cultivation Patterns of Tomato and Celery Cold Awning in The East of Hebei Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to explore the three kinds pattern cold awning of three-receive highly effective cultivation in the east of Hebei Province,we introduct tomato guarantees the powder 1,1857,the west celery Ventura new variety,Comparing with the local tradition variety tomato L402,L400 and the celery glass crisp,the new variety has the fine commercial quality and the price superiority.Improved the local ordinary greatly cold awning,and designs the non-column cold awning which does not had back wall Canada to cover with a mat with the reasonable structure,few invests and high benefits.In this kind of three-receive cold awning,the tomatoes and the celery springs can be produced ahead of time to supply the market off season after the fall,and extend the vegetables supply time.The amount of the single awning output of this three kinds of three-receive pattern(400 m2)was 11 156.30 Yuan,increaed 4 245.90 Yuan compared to the ordinary greatly two-receive pattern single awning.This pattern had the characteristics of high output,superior quality,high benefits and broad promoted prospect and so on.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".