MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W236672648

Quebec: Detection of bovine lymphotropic herpesvirus DNA in tissues of a bovine aborted fetus.

2010· article· en· W236672648 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carl A. Gagnon, Ossama Allam, Richard Drolet, Donald Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeospora caninumVirologyBovine herpesvirus 1Coxiella burnetiiBiologyAbortionQ feverPolymerase chain reactionAborted FetusVirusAntibodyPregnancyImmunologyToxoplasma gondiiHerpesviridaeViral disease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

of Montreal initiated a research project to investigate the etiological agents involved in cow abortion in Quebec, Canada.Several reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and PCR-based assays were done on placenta and tissues of aborted fetuses that were submitted to the MBDL for the detection of bovine pathogens that are known to be involved in abortion such as bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), infectious bovine rhinotracheatis herpesvirus (IBR), Neospora caninum, Leptospira spp.and Coxiella burnetii (1, 2).From the 26 submitted cases of bovine abortion that were tested, none were positive for BVDV and Leptospira spp., whereas 3.8%, 11.5%, and 3.8% were positive for IBR, Neospora caninum, and Coxiella burnetii, respectively (Table 1).In addition to the usual PCR assays, a pan-herpesvirus nested-PCR assay, which is able to detect a broad spectrum of herpesvirus species, was conducted on placenta and pooled tissues of aborted fetuses as previously described (3).Briefly, DNA was extracted from samples with the QIAamp DNA mini kit (QIAGEN, Mississauga, Ontario) according to the manufacturer's tissue protocol.The PCR was carried out in a Biometra T3 thermocycler with the QIAGEN Fast Cycling PCR kit according to the manufacturer's specification with a set of 3 primers (DFA, ILK, and KG1).Amplification conditions

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207