Study on Drought Resistance of Five Kinds Forage and Crops During Seed Germination Period under PEG Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five kinds of forage and crops(alfalfa,sweet clover,rumex K-1,chicory,Sorghum hybrid sudangrass) seeds were selected as the materials in this paper,with different concentrations of PEG-6000(0,5%,10%,15%,20%,25% and 30%) simulated drought stress conditions,drought resistance of five kinds of forage and crops during seed germination was studied.The relative germination percentage,relative germination index,relative vigor index and drought index were determined.The results showed: It had significant influence among PEG concentrations for seeds germination(p 0.01).There was significant difference among the five species about the relative germination percentage,relative germination index,relative vigor index(p 0.01).The low content PEG-6000 improved seed germination of Rumex K-1,Sorghum hybrid sudangrass,and Sorghum hybrid sudangrass of the drought resistance index,but with the concentration of PEG-6000 increased,the inhibitory also increased,four indexes decreased with increasing concentration of PEG-6000.The comprehensive evaluation of the five species by the membership function method indicated that the drought resistances decreased in the order was Sorghum hybrid sudangrass,Rumex K-1,Alfalfa,Sweet clover,Chicory.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".