The Efficacy Observation of Nimodipine on Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients with Post-Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe Nimodipine in patients of post-stroke on cognitive function improvement.Methods 145 cases of post-stroke patients with Cognitive dysfunction were randomly divided into two groups,the control group with conventional treatment of the primary disease,rehabilitation training and psychological support;the treatment group at the same time on the basis of a combination of Nimodipine tablets with 30mg,3 times one day,each group of patients with treatment and follow-up to the end of the 4th week.The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale(Montreal Cognitive Assessment,MoCA) were used at Pre-treatment and treatment at the end of 4 weeks.Results MoCA Scale score showed no statistical difference between two groups of patients before treatment(P0.05);4 weeks after treatment,MoCA Scale score of the control group showed improvement,but no statistical difference was observed when compared with Pre-treatment(P0.05),and MoCA Scale score of the treatment group show significantly improvement,with statistical difference on the faculty of memory and visuopatial/executive(P0.05).Conclusion The efficacy of Nimodipine on cognitive function improvement in patients of post-stroke was confirmed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".