Productive Evaluation on Different Oat(Avena sativa) Varieties in Alpine Region of Tianzhu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comparison study on oat varieties was conducted at Tianzhu Alpine Grassland Research Station of Jingqianghe Area,China.The results showed that in Jingqianghe area,the growth period of all the varieties of oat (Avena sativa) was nearly 100d,all of them were mid term mature or late mature varieties; Among them,No.444 Yongjiu,P67,Canadian Cultivator and No.404 Yongjiu grew rapidly,with 2.70cm/d、2.36cm/d、2.22cm/d and 2.02cm/d growth speed respectively; The variety of Canadian Cultivated had the highest absolute growth rate(AGR) and the variety of No.1 Yongjiu possessed the highest relative growth rate(RGR); The variety of P20 had the highest forage yield,with 50.55 and 16.18t/hm 2 of the fresh matter(FM) and dry matter(DM),while the variety of No.440 Yongjiu Oat possessed the lowest forage yield,with 17.22t/hm 2 FM and 5.51t/hm 2 DM: Compared with other Varieties,P67,No.444 Yongjiu,No.066 and Romania had lower stem/leaf ratio(S/L),more leaves and better palatability,their qualities were better,they were the better varieties to get high quality grassland.When combined all the measurements,it can be concluded that P20,CC,P67 and No.444 were the target varieties used for artificial oat grassland with high productivity and good quality in Jingqianghe area,the Tianzhu alpine region of China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".